About Me

Name: Gray Ghost
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Bush Administration Rule Makes It Harder for Congress to Block Oil and Gas Drilling

The Associated Press reported today that the Bush administration is trying to make it tougher for Congress to block mining and oil and gas drilling on public lands. The Bureau of Land Management, which manages 258 million acres of federal property, stripped from its regulations Thursday a provision that gives two Congressional committees the power to compel the Interior Secretary to temporarily place public land off limits to mining and oil and gas development.

Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), top candidate for interior secretary under President-elect Barack Obama, attempted to employ the little-used provision for the first time in more than 20 years earlier this year in an effort to halt uranium mining near the Grand Canyon. The House Natural Resources Committee passed a measure to block the mining 20-2, but the Interior Department has yet to issue an emergency withdrawal, saying there were not enough Republicans present for a quorum. According to Grijalva, "the last-minute change was part of a strategy by the Bush administration to avoid complying with the resolution."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (36) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mississippi Vs. North Carolina: Car Jacking

The following two articles illustrate the difference in "carjacking" in North Carolina and Mississippi. The Mississippi "model" MUST become the preferred method of dealing with this crime in the United States.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (27) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

House Democrats Plan Bill to Help States Build Infrastructure

The National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) reported the following today:
The New York Times (12/2, A20, Pear) reports, "House Democrats said Monday that they would try to pass an economic recovery bill costing $400 billion to $500 billion next month as governors pressed Congress for money to build roads and bridges, provide health care to low-income people and develop alternative sources of energy." House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) hopes to have a bill ready for President-elect Barack Obama when he takes office next month. Pennsylvania Gov. Edward G. Rendell, chairman of the National Governors Association (NGA), "said the states had $136 billion of transportation and public works projects 'ready to go.' States, he said, want to use the money for roads and bridges, airports, transit systems, ports, railways, schools, waste water treatment plants and broadband networks," which could lead to many new jobs. But, a main factor that will determine whether or not the bill will pass is how Democrats "negotiate with Republicans." Some Republican lawmakers want the government to offset new spending.

The Washington Post (12/2, D1, Connolly) adds on the front page of its Business section that "if Congress passes an economic stimulus bill of $500 billion to $700 billion, as Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) expects, then $150 billion for infrastructure is 'not outlandish,' Schumer said. 'If we want to avoid a steep downward spiral, we need a strong injection quickly,' he said. Spending on infrastructure 'has a multiplier effect; it causes other people to be employed.'" Governors are expected to ask for about "$136 billion for infrastructure projects and $40 billion to bolster Medicaid health programs."

The Christian Science Monitor (12/1, Cook) noted that "of the projects states have ready to roll out, 'well over 70 percent are transportation' related, Rendell said. They are 'not curbside repairing,' Rendell said, but 'major, major' projects likes bridges and roads." Vermont Governor Jim Douglas, vice chairman of the NGA, said that "states are not asking the federal government to make up all of their revenue losses." He said, "'States are not just coming to Washington with hands out,' but are also cutting their spending."

Bloomberg News
(12/2, Selway) points out that "30 states are dealing with budget shortfalls totaling $30 billion for the current budget year, which ends in June for most states, on top of the cuts they made when they put their budgets together just months ago," according to the NGA and the National Conference of State Legislatures. Meanwhile, "25 states are forecasting shortfalls totaling $60 billion for the 2010 year." Taking into account "the budget cuts made before the year began, the states are contending with budget shortfalls totaling $140 billion for the 2009 and 2010 budget years," and "that number may grow as the year progresses."
 
I have only one question: Where is the money coming from? I remember the 1960's. Federal grants of all kinds were available for the construction of water systems, wastewater systems, storm water systems, roads, and other types of infrastructure. However, during the 1960's the US economy was booming. Since August of this year, the US economy is not too strong. Funds have been allocated for the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac "bailout". Unless Congress intends on drastically increasing the debt, where will we get the money? (Perhaps I already know the answer: TAXES.) 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On the Funnier (?) Side

Many people here at TH have asked me about what it is like to be a Mississippian and what my fair state is like. The following address will take you to a youtube video that was made at Lake Washington here in Mississippi (about 70 miles South of where I live). I even know one of the "good old boys" in the video.
I have fished Lake Washington many times. There are many snakes there. And even though I won't do what the boys in this video do, it still shows (within reasonable limits) what it is like to be a Mississippian. Enjoy the video.
 
(And thank God there aren't that many Mississippians in the world.)
 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (58) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Alaska's North Slope Contains Deposits of Frozen Natural Gas

The National Society of Professional Engineers just sent its members a report concerning the following: "Frozen crystals packed with concentrated natural gas and buried 2,000 feet below the permafrost on Alaska's North Slope could become the next major domestic energy source." This study was released on Wednesday, November 11, 2008, by the U.S. Geological Survey.
The study finds that in the North Slope, frozen methane-and-water crystals known as hydrates contain as much as 85.4 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas. "That's enough to heat 100 million homes for as long as 10 years," Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said. The interior secretary added that, "globally, hydrates have more potential for energy than all other fossil fuels combined. ... This can be a paradigm shift."
 
Government research is beginning to show that it may be possible to extract hydrates using depressurization, a technique used to get at more conventional fuel sources. Steve Rinehart, a spokesman for British Petroleum in Alaska said that, "boring into the ground may be enough to change the pressure to extract it. ... Or the pressure could be changed by pumping."
 
Although there are tremendous hydrate deposits in Arctic regions, they also exist in the deepwater regions of the Gulf of Mexico, an area where there are existing natural gas pipelines. (Though much of the government research into hydrates has taken place in Alaska, it might be cheaper to consider the Gulf of Mexico first.)
 
I wonder how long this information concerning Alaska has been known? (Another point for my "conspiracy theories"?) You can read the news article at:
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (35) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wanted: Young Blood for 2012

Please take a look at the video on YouTube at the following address:
 
 
This young man understands what happened on November 4, 2008, better than 95% of the pundits who are commenting about the election. Although I don't share his "love" of Mike Huckabee, I have to admit that Huckabee would have done better than McCain.
 
The video is 9 minutes long and is worth watching.
Tags: 2012   2008  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (19) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An American Hero

United States Army Specialist Joseph Gibson of the 2nd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, was on a mission to find and eliminate terrorists in Iraq in April 2008. Gibson and his fellow Rangers were being transported by helicopter. The chopper touched down at night and the soldiers disembarked, only to come under immediate enemy fire. One Ranger received a life-threatening wound in the firefight and Gibson helped navigate him over an uneven field filled with irrigation ditches to safety.

That’s when the fight got interesting. The Rangers continued with their mission, clearing a field with tall grass and canals near the helicopter’s landing zone. As Gibson walked through the field in the dark, he stepped on a terrorist hiding in a ditch. He took another step forward before turning to see what he had stepped on. The jihadi then moved to kill him and as many other Rangers as possible, but Gibson grabbed the terrorist’s rifle muzzle as he opened fire. Gibson wrestled him to the ground, stripping the enemy of his weapon, but the jihadi disarmed Gibson as well. Ferocious hand-to-hand combat ensued. The terrorist then reached for the detonator to his suicide vest and screamed “bomb!” in English. To put it simply, Gibson beat the jihadi unconscious. Then, “I got my weapon into his stomach and fired,” Gibson said. “He came back to consciousness after that, [but] I knew I got him. I stood up and neutralized him.” For his outstanding courage under fire and the daring rescue of his fellow Ranger, Spc Gibson was awarded the Silver Star.
 
This man is a d*mn fine descendant of the proud lineage of Roger's Rangers!
 
Reprinted from "The Patriot Post", October 24, 2008.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (45) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Five Best Halloween Movies of All Time

 
Since we are close to Halloween, I thought I would again post my personal list of the 5 best Halloween movies of all time (with an honorable mention). I hope you will enjoy this list; I will personally guarantee that all of these movies are worth watching. However, you are advised that "Signs" is very intense so it might not be a good movie for children under the age of ten(10).

(I have been doing this list of movies for over ten years. So far, the only change I have made is to add an "Honorable Mention".) 
 
 
1. Arsenic and Old Lace (1944, Rated G)
    It doesn't get any better than this Cary Grant movie. The scene is Brooklyn. It is Halloween night. The Brewsters have a few family secrets and more than their share of relatives that are not playing with a full deck of cards. This is a truly classic Halloween movie.
 
2. Spaced Invaders (1989, Rated PG)
    The Martians have invaded the USA (Prepare to die Earth Scum!) on Halloween night and a small town fights back. Don't ask questions, just sit back and enjoy the fun. In many ways, this movie represents "Small Town America" and its values (on a comedy scale anyway).
 
3. The Adventures of Icabod and Mr. Toad (1950, Rated G)
     Walt Disney knew how to do cartoons. This is one of his best. The second half is on the "Legend of Sleepy Hollow" and the headless horseman, with Bing Crosby singing and doing the narration. I have been to the real Sleepy Hollow on the Hudson River in New York. The animators of this cartoon have shown it correctly.
 
4. The Ghost Breakers (1940, Rated G)
    This is one of the movies that gave Dan Akroyd and Harold Ramis the idea for "The Ghostbusters". Bob Hope, pre WW2 Cuba, a haunted castle, and a hidden treasure; plus Bob Hope gives the best description of Democrats ever.
 
5. The Thing from Another World (1951, Rated G)
     With actor James Arness as a giant "carrot" man from outer space, this movie is both funny and "campy". (By the way, the title of this movie, and the year it was released, have nothing to do with me; regardless of what any of my relatives have said.)
 
Honorable Mention: Signs (2002, Rated PG13)
     Mel Gibson is a preacher who has lost his faith in God due to the death of his wife. However, events are starting to happen in the world that will shake his quiet existence in Pennsylvania. I will give you a prior warning: This movie is intense. The first time I saw it, my wife had gotten it for me to watch while she went to a school meeting. I knew nothing about the movie at all and watched it only because she had gone to all this trouble to do something nice for me. About a quarter of the way through (after turning on all the lights), I realized I was looking at a true classic.  
 
 
 
TRICK OR TREAT!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (49) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On the Funnier (?) Side

Just when you thought this election couldn't get any stranger, along comes this news article from the St. Petersburg Times.
 
The head line reads: "Vote Drives Defended, Despite Fake Names".
 
Honest to God, ACORN tried to register Mickey Mouse as a voter in Florida. You will note that the application does show Mickey's place of residence as Orlando. His social security number is also shown as: 123-15-1778.
 
And I hope this is enough evidence of ACORN's illegal activity to bring a federal investigation against this organization.
 
If not, perhaps ACORN will receive the award for "Stupidity" this year at the Oscars.
 
                           
 
I wonder where Minnie Mouse's application is?
 
If you would like to see the full article, please go to the following address:
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (55) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Undiscovered Oil and Natural Gas in the Black Warrior Basin

In late 2007, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) assessed the undiscovered oil and gas resources of the Black Warrior Basin in northeastern Mississippi and northwestern Alabama. This assessment is based on the geologic elements of each total petroleum system defined in the province, including hydrocarbon source rocks; reservoir rocks; and hydrocarbon traps.
 
For the Black Warrior Basin, the USGS estimated means of 8,511 billion cubic feet of gas, 5.9 million barrels of oil, and 7.6 million barrels of total natural gas liquids. This is good news for the states of Mississippi and Alabama. The Black Warrior Basin was one of the earliest oil and natural gas fields developed in the US. And it has been in continuous production for over a hundred years. Production in this field has been falling off for years.  

Please see the following map which indicates the area of the basin:
           
 
Now I know that the Black Warrior Basin, when compared to the Bakken Field and the Marcellus Ridge, amounts to no more than "hors d'oeuvres". But my point is: "Did you know anything about this?" I live in Mississippi and keep up with such things, being a professional engineer. But up until last week, I didn't have a clue about this.
 
Hypothesis:  Is there a conspiracy in the US to keep the knowledge concerning the size of our oil and natural gas resources away from the general public? It would have on-going for about 20 years now. 
 
The USGS assessment, mentioned above, can now be found at:
 
pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs-038-03/FS-038-03-508.pdf
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (26) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Marcellus Ridge Natural Gas Field

In 2002, the U.S. Geological Service (USGS) made a hugh discovery in a 54,000 square-mile swath (stretching from West Virginia to New York) in the Appalachian Mountains. Geologists call this area the "Marcellus Ridge". The drawing below indicates the area of this ridge:
    
  
 
 
These geologists have conservatively estimated that the Marcellus shale contains 168 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in place and optimistically suggests that the amounts could be as high as 516 trillion cubic feet. The U.S. currently produces roughly 30 trillion cubic feet of natural gas per year from our existing wells. Due to the age of most of the existing natural gas wells, this number (i.e., 30 trillion cubic feet) is dropping.
 
The technology exists to easily recover 50 trillion cubic feet of gas from the Marcellus Ridge, thus keeping the U.S. production up. If this recovery is realized, the Marcellus Ridge would be considered a "Super Giant" gas field (the geologists' words, not mine).
 
Why then, you might ask, has no one really heard about this news? Well there are two reasons. First, in most states, geologic surveys are released to the public almost instantly. In Texas, for example, a survey must be released in 60 days or less. In Oklahoma and Nevada there are similar laws. However, in Pennsylvania (where the majority of this field is located) the information doesn't have to be made public for a full five years.
 
Second, guess who is playing "fast and loose" with this knowledge? If you guessed Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and the Democrat Party, then go to the head of the class.

My "so called conspiracy theories" are starting to multiply. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In the "Tank" for Renewable Energy

In business, timing is everything. On May 25, 2007, Speaker Nancy Pelosi bought at least $100,000.00 in the initial offering of a renewable energy stock. The name of this stock was "CLNE", standing for the Clean Energy Fuels Corporation. Some of you might remember the original name of this company. The original name of this company was "Pickens Fuel", so named after the company’s primary investor, T. Boone Pickens.

The reason I said "at least $100,000.00" (in the first paragraph) is that it is entirely possible that Speaker Pelosi bought over $3,000,000.00 in stock in this company. The listing of companies and individuals that bought stock during the initial offering (uncovered by such groups as "dontgo Movement.com") shows a large number of dummy corporations and Democrat-controlled trust funds. It is more than possible that Speaker Pelosi, and several key Democrat Leaders, now control CLNE.

So what, you might ask. Let’s go further along in time. On February 27, 2008, the US House of Representatives passed the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008 (H.R. 5351). Speaker Pelosi used extreme pressure to make sure this bill passed the US House. Some representatives said that Speaker Pelosi did everything but "place a gun to their head" to make sure they voted correctly. 

But concerning the US Senate version (S. 3044), what occurred was interesting. The bill needed 60 votes under Senate rules to move forward but failed 58 to 41, with 8 Republicans joining 48 Democrats and 2 independents in support of it. Aides of Senator John McCain said he would have opposed the measure, but he was absent during the vote. (Note: Speaker Pelosi chastised Senator McCain for his absence.) 

If the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008 had passed, the value of Speaker Pelosi’s stock could have been worth over $30,000,000.00. But more importantly, the Democrat Party would have controlled the development of renewable resources in the US. They would do so by determining who got grants and loans under the "rules" of this bill. However, you have to give Speaker Pelosi credit. As soon as it was evident that the "US Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008" was dead in the water, Speaker Pelosi and the California State Legislature hit the road with a "new battle plan".

The "new battle plan" is California's Proposition 10. (Proposition 10 is also known as the "California Alternative Fuels Initiative".) Proposition 10 would spend $5 billion in California bond money ($10 billion by the time the interest is paid, according to the LA Times) to promote natural gas as an cleaner alternative for automobile and truck fuel in California. Interestingly enough, in an LA Times editorial, Anthony Rubenstein was highly critical of Proposition 10, calling the proposition a "raid on California's general fund to support ‘Pickens’ self-serving national gas agenda."

"The initiative deceptively reads like it's supporting all alternative-fuel vehicles and renewable energy," Rubenstein wrote. "But a closer read finds a laundry list of cash grabs. … Much of the measure's billions could benefit Pickens' company to the exclusion of almost all other clean-vehicle fuels and technology."

And guess who T. Boone Pickens newest best friend is, at least since May 25, 2007?

But don’t worry. The Democrats have a new scheme for controlling US energy. On May 22, 2008, Representative Maxine Waters said the following during the "grilling" of oil executives during a US House panel meeting:

"And guess what this liberal would be all about. This liberal will be about socializing … uh, um. …" (The congresswoman paused to collect her thoughts.) "Would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies. …"

And what party affiliation is Representative Waters? And what state does she represent? For those who don’t know, she is a Democrat representing the 35th District of California. Strange isn’t it? Waters and Pelosi are both Democrats and both represent California.

I use to laugh at conspiracy theories (the JFK assassination, Bigfoot, etc.), but no more. As The Monkees use to say: "Now I’m a believer."
Please go to the following sites:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=72225

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-rubenstein29-2008jul29,0,2980323.story

http://www.house.gov/pelosi/

http://www.house.gov/waters/

http://dontgomovement.com/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (74) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Bakken Oil Field

In April of 2008, the U.S. Geological Service (USGS) issued a report concerning the Bakken Field (also known as the Williston Basin). This revised report, which had not been updated since 1995, estimated the oil reserve in the Bakken Field. The drawing below indicates the area of this field:                 

The amount of oil in this field which is easily recoverable is estimated by this report to be anywhere between 3.0 billion barrels to as much as 4.3 billion barrels. Plus this oil is light, sweet crude!

But it gets better, various government agencies (including the Department of Energy) have estimated that the total amount of oil in this formation could be as high as 500 billion barrels. This includes oil in oil shale and oil not recoverable with today’s technology.

This number (i.e., 500 billion barrels) is larger than the entire Saudi Arabia fields. With the new techniques that the oil industry has developed over the last twenty years, it is anybody’s guess as to how much of this oil will become "recoverable" in the next twenty years.

But if the 4.0 billion barrels number is all that is correct, at a cost of $100.00 per barrel this represents a net worth to the US of $400,000,000,000.00. That is correct, 400 hundred billion dollars.

A slide show of this USGS Report can be found at the following address:

http://energy.usgs.gov/flash/Bakken_slideshow.swf

The "pdf" file of this USGS report can be found at the following address:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3021/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (16) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mainstream Media Lied and People Died

The last remnant of Iraq's nuclear program (a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium) reached a Canadian port on July 5, 2008. This completed a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing of two oceans.

See anything wrong with this picture? For more than five years, the "Looney Left" and the Mainstream Media have said that Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction. "Bush Lied and People Died." Somehow, that slogan loses its credibility now that 550 metric tons of yellowcake (used for nuclear weapon enrichment) have been shipped to Canada for a new use in the nuclear energy field.

In 2003 American troops found 550 metric tons of uranium after invading Iraq. Our troops had to sit on this information and the uranium itself, for fear of terrorists attempting to steal it. It was guarded and kept safe by our military in a 23,000-acre site, with large sand beams surrounding the site.
This is a vindication for the Bush administration. They were attacked mercilessly by the Mainstream Media and the far-left pundits concerning the missing "WMD’s". Now that it is proven that President Bush did not lie about Saddam's nuclear ambitions, one would think the Mainstream Media would report the story. Once the AP released the story, the Mainstream Media should have picked it up and broadcast it worldwide, Right? 
 
Wrong! This never happened, due in large part to the fact that the Mainstream Media would have to admit they were wrong about Bush's war motives all along. Thankfully, the AP got it right when it said, "The removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake (the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment) was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy."
Conservatives now have another reason to say the "War in Iraq" was entirely correct! As far as the anti-war crowd is concerned, the next time they say that Bush lied, they should be told that THEY ARE WRONG. (Read the article yourself by going to the article at the address below.)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/

Tags: msm   WMD  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (36) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Skirmish at the Sword Family Farm

In early September 1777, General John Burgoyne (and the British army he commanded) groped southward from present day Schuylerville, New York. Burgoyne’s objective was Albany, New York, and the destruction of the American army under General Horatio Gates. Supposedly at Albany, two other British armies would rendezvous with Burgoyne and his army, dividing the colonies and isolating the New England colonies from the rest of the country. The Revolutionary War would be over; and the British Crown could bring the "troops home for Christmas".
 
The British army had found it increasingly necessary to forage for supplies during this campaign. But after the disaster on August 16, 1777, at Bennington, Vermont, Burgoyne was keeping his foraging parties close to the British main army. At Bennington the British army had lost over 900 "foragers" to a group of ragamuffin militia under the able command of former Rogers’ Ranger (now American general) John Stark. After a day long, heavily fought battle (with both sides being reinforced at critical junctures during the engagement), total British losses were recorded at 207 dead and 700 captured. American losses were recorded at 40 dead and 30 wounded.
 
However, this "closeness" of the British foragers to the British main army would not be caution enough.

Only a few days before, Gates’ American army had been reinforced by perhaps the best unit in the Continental army, the Rifle Corps under the command of Daniel Morgan. All of these soldiers were volunteers. Each soldier was armed with the technological equivalent (in today's terms) of a long-range "sniper rifle". The "Pennsylvania" rifles of the Rifle Corps had only two equals in the world: the German "Jaeger" rifle and the British "Ferguson" rifle. Unfortunately for Burgoyne, neither of these fine weapons were available to his army (although it is believed that several German units in Burgoyne’s army had a few of the "Jaeger" rifles).

On the morning of September 18, 1777, approximately 100 British regulars, loyalists, French Canadians, and a handful of Indians were digging for potatoes at the abandoned Sword Family farm, some 500 yards in the advance of the British main army.

In a lightning attack, General Daniel Morgan announced his presence on the battlefield. Hitting the foragers from three sides, elements of the American Rifle Corps killed, wounded, or captured over 30 men, without losing a single man. Although this engagement was "small potatoes" in the larger scheme of things, it should always be remembered by Americans. Because of this action at Sword’s Farm, General Burgoyne decided to make a risky, foolhardy assault on American positions on the next day, thus starting the Battle of Saratoga.
 
                                             
 

(Thirty-five years ago this week, my wife and I first visited the Saratoga National Park. For two young "kids", it was exciting to be in New York State and seeing historical places we had both heard about all of our lives. I have a picture of my wife under a tree in the Saratoga National Park. The leaves on this tree are the most beautiful yellow I had ever seen.
 
I made a promise to write about this visit "when I was old and gray". A note to my younger self: the promise is fulfilled.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive