About Me

Name: Gray Ghost
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Is Iran "Backing Off" from the Threat to Destroy Israel?

Back on October 31, 2009, the Saudi daily Al-Watan published an article about an unprecedented crisis in Yemen-Iran relations. The Yemen government accused Iran of supporting the Houthi rebels in the Sa'da region of northern Yemen. The article indicated that apprehension was increasing in Saudi Arabia about the ramifications of Iran's increased military activity in Yemen and in the Red Sea.
 
Today, January 4, 2010, the Saudi newspaper Al-Riyadh quoted a high-ranking Yemeni diplomatic source in Cairo which claimed that the U.S. is refraining from dealing harshly with the Houthi rebels, in order not to anger Iran. Yemeni Foreign Minister Abu Bakr Al-Kirbi denied that the U.S. had attacked Al-Qaeda strongholds in Yemen, saying, "Yemen army aircraft had carried out the bombings."
 
Al-Kirbi further said said that Yemen and the U.S. had not reached an agreement over the use of U.S. aircraft or cruise missiles for bombing Al-Qaeda targets on Yemeni soil.
 
"Skirmishes" between Iraqi and Iranian military forces on the border between these two countries are increasing in number.
 
The Qom Seminary Teachers Society, which supports Ahmadinejad, recently announced that Ayatollah Yousef Sanei (a supporter of the Iranian protest movement and critic of the Iranian president) had been stripped of his religious title.
 
In a recent sermon in Tehran, Guardian Council Secretary Ahmad Jannati said, "The regime could not tolerate opposition and insults to Islam, and that the members of the protest movement must apologize to the people for their actions or else be executed."
 
Meanwhile, Iranian protest movement leader Mir Hossein Mousavi has posted on his FaceBook page a five-point plan for resolving the crisis in Iran after the latest protests:
        
      1. The regime will acknowledge its responsibility for the crisis.
      2. New clean elections will be held.
      3. Prisoners and protesters will be freed.
      4. Freedom of the press, of expression and of assembly will be guaranteed.
      5. Freedom of action will be given to political parties.
 
Mousavi declared that he and Mehdi Karroubi (Iranian reformist politician and one of the major leaders of the Iranian protest movement) are willing to die for their cause.
 
If all of the above sounds confusing, join the club. Iran seems to be on conflicting paths. And the direction these paths could take could lead to anything from an interal revolution to a war with Iran's neighbors.
 
On the other hand, Israel is being very quiet. Almost too quiet. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (38) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming in the Mississippi Delta

Global Warming hit the Mississippi Delta with a vengeance this morning. And the following photos attest to the degree of "warming".
        
                  
 
At 6:00am this morning, the wind chill was 12 degrees F, with an actual temperature of 22 degrees F. The winds were from the Northwest at about 8 mph, and the humidity was 72%.
 
Frankly I am getting tired of Al Gore and his "con" game.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (32) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. History and Why We Study It

When I was a boy, about 6 or 7 years old, my father did a wonderful thing. He "turned me on" to the study of history. At first I studied World War 2. My father had served in this war as a fighter pilot. I met many of his old friends who were also fighter pilots. Naturally, as a young boy, their stories and their camaraderie mystified me. It all seemed to be "dream-like", something that happened long ago.

As I got older, I branched out in my studies. My family and I visited Shiloh when I was about 9. I was amazed at this national park. The numbers of dead soldiers, both North and South, were almost inconceivable. And because the Civil War Centennial was just starting up (with men dressing in the colorful uniforms of that period), I decided to start my study of the Civil War in conjunction with my study of World War 2.

At age 13, I added World War 1 after seeing "Sergeant York" at junior high school. At age 15 I saw "Northwest Passage" on TV; this caused me to include the French and Indian War. During the summer between my junior and senior years in high school, I saw "Drums Along the Mohawk" on TV. Naturally I added the Revolutionary War.

By the time I was at Mississippi State University (and in Air Force ROTC), all my spare time was spent either dating my future wife (who was at MSCW), hunting at Noxubee Refuge, fishing at Oktibbeha Lake, or reading books on history. In 1973, the US Air Force enacted a RIF (Reduction in Force). I decided to get out and pursue the profession I had been training for at MSU (i.e., electrical engineering).

For the next 35 years, I read and studied history as a hobby. I have learned much in my studies. I learned, for example, that we are blessed in this country with literally thousands of men and women worthy of emulation.

I learned that history is fixed. In and of itself, it cannot be changed. Our interpretation of it might change, but the actual events themselves cannot change. Sometimes, newly discovered, first-hand accounts of historical events can cause our knowledge of these events to increase. But all in all, HISTORY DOES NOT CHANGE. That means that we in the US share a common bond, i.e. our history. That common bond brings us together as a people. It means a citizen from California and a citizen from Mississippi can always find a "kinship" to each other. Their accents might differ. Their taste in food and music might differ. But we are all part of this great experience started in 1776.

I also learned that the study of history can give some one a unique insight into the future. In so much as the following quote is from a man who although I do not like or respect his lifestyle, I totally believe was correct in this statement of fact:

"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."

  George Santayana

Truer words were never spoken. But they are true only in one sense. If you do the same things, over and over, not only will you repeat history but also you are an idiot. If, on the other hand, you learned from your first experience and tried something new, then at least you have a chance of changing the consequences of your actions.

Also the study of US History can be a powerful training tool for the youth of this country. As I mentioned, there are literally thousands of men and women in our history who are worthy of emulation. They were from all walks of life and all races. These include such diverse people as: Charles Proteus Steinmetz (engineering), George W. Carver (botany), John F. Reynolds (US military), Jonas E. Salk (medicine), and Booker T. Washington (education). Today’s young person can do a lot worse than pattern their lives after the people I just mentioned.

Examples are important. Without them our children are lacking a "reference" point.

US History is fixed. Unless new evidence is found, it cannot be changed. My wife is a public school teacher. She has taught for 28 years. In the last few years I have noticed subtle changes occurring in the high school level history textbooks. For example, these books now state that slavery was the only cause of the Civil War. That is like saying that grape jelly is the only "condiment" that can be used to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. There are no discussions that it was the primary cause along with the rise of "regionalism" and the political factor of "states’ rights". There are no discussions of economic causes. There are no discussions of the political chaos brought about by a battle between the differing factions in the US Congress. No, the only cause of the Civil War is now said to be slavery.

Is this being written to: to increase the tension between whites and blacks in this country, to alleviate the guilt felt by the writers of these textbooks, or perhaps to change the regional perceptions felt by all parts of our nation? Whatever the reason for this change in recent textbooks (and other changes I did not mention), they do have one great effect: they will dissolve the bonds that join us together. A black New Yorker will now tend to be more than ever distrustful of a white Tennessean. A Hispanic from Los Angeles will now tend to be more than ever distrustful of an Asian from Baltimore.

By "changing" history, "distrust" is being entered into the US equation.

The knowledge of history can translate into knowledge of the future. If we know that "x" plus "y" does NOT equal "z" (from past experience), then we know in the future not to try that again. However, if the history textbooks have been changed, then perhaps we will not know to try that again.

US History is filled with failures that do not need to be repeated: the sexual revolution of the 1960’s, recreational drug use (both in the late 1800’s and the late 1900’s), and others.
 
So perhaps the answer to my question ("U.S. History and Why Do We Study It") is twofold. First, it is part of the "bond" that we as citizens of the US share, part of the "glue" that keeps us together. Second, the knowledge of this history will perhaps keep us from making the same mistakes over and over again.
Tags: US History  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (52) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Top Ten Favorite War Movies

Sometimes, we all need some fun. So after reading the 11/17/09 edition of The Weekly Claw at Crawfish's site, I decided to post my own "Top Ten" list of my favorite war movies.
  1. Battleground: Release Date: November 9, 1949; B/W; Winner of two Academy Awards (nominated for 6, including Best Picture).
  2. Van Johnson, Ricardo Montalban and George Murphy star in this remarkable war film. The movie deals with the 327th Glider Regiment of the 101st Division at the Battle at Bastogne.

     

  3. They Were Expendable: Release Date: December 20, 1945; B/W; Nominated for two Academy Rewards.
  4. Robert Montgomery, John Wayne and Ward Bond star in this war film, directed by John Ford. It is a dramatized account of the role of the American PT Boats in the defense of the Philippines in early World War II. The screenplay was taken from the book of same name.

  5. Twelve O’Clock High: Release Date: February 13, 1950; B/W; Winner of two Academy Awards (nominated for 4, including Best Picture).
  6. Gregory Peck and Dean Jagger star in this movie about the 8th Air Force during World War II. In this story of the early days of daylight bombing raids over Germany, an American General must take command of a "hard luck" bomber group. Much of the story deals with his struggle to whip his group into a disciplined fighting unit in spite of heavy losses, and withering attacks by German fighters over their targets. Actual combat footage is used in this war drama.

     

  7. Sergeant York: Release Date: September 27, 1941; B/W; Winner of two Academy Awards (nominated for 11, including Best Picture).
  8. Gary Cooper stars in this true story about one of America’s greatest heroes and Medal of Honor winner, Alvin York of Tennessee. Alvin York was an advisor during filming.

     

  9. The Story of GI Joe: Release Date: July 13, 1945; B/W; Nominated for four Academy Awards.
  10. Burgess Meredith and Robert Mitchum star in this movie about the US Army in North Africa, Sicily, and Italy. The film is directed from the viewpoint of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. And the movie shows how the individual G.I. survived the drudgery of war, the discomfort of war, and the terror of combat.

     

  11. Gettysburg: Release Date: October 8, 1993; Color.
  12. Jeff Daniels steals the show while portraying Medal of Honor winner Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain of Maine. The screenplay is taken from the Pulitzer Prize winning book, The Killer Angels.

     

  13. Guadalcanal Diary: Release Date: October 27, 1943; B/W.
  14. Anthony Quinn and Lloyd Nolan star in this movie about the Marines at Guadalcanal . The screenplay is taken from the book of the same name, written by war correspondent Lamar Trotti.

     


  15. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo: Release Date: November 1, 1944; B/W; Winner of one Academy Award (nominated for 2).
  16. Van Johnson and Spencer Tracy star in this true story about the first bombing of Japan during World War II. The screenplay is taken from the book of the same name, written by a participant in the raid (Ted Lawson). (Note: My mother dated Ted Lawson’s copilot during the raid, Dean Davenport, for awhile during the war.)

  17. To Hell and Back: Release Date: October 18, 1955; Color.
  18. Audie Murphy of Texas stars as himself, the most decorated soldier in US history and winner of the Medal of Honor. The screenplay was taken from his autobiography.

  19. The Sands of Iwo Jima: Release Date: March 1, 1950; B/W; Nominated for four Academy Awards, including Best Actor for John Wayne.
          John Wayne stars in this movie about the Marines at Tarawa and Iwo Jima.

Be sure to take a look at the 11/20/09 edition of The Weekly Claw. Crawfish will publish his own list of war movies.
 

Tags: war movies  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (36) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Five Favorite Halloween Movies

Since we are close to Halloween, I thought I would again post my personal list of the 5 best Halloween movies of all time (also with an honorable mention). I hope you will enjoy this list; I will personally guarantee that all of these movies are worth watching. However, you are advised that "Signs" is very intense so it might not be a good movie for children under the age of ten(10). 

If you have your own list of movies, please send it to me. I am always on the lookout for good movies.
 
 
1. Arsenic and Old Lace (1944, Rated G)
    It doesn't get any better than this Cary Grant movie. The scene is Brooklyn. It is Halloween night. The Brewsters have a few family secrets and more than their share of relatives that are not playing with a full deck. If you have never seen this true classic, you need to.
 
 
2. Spaced Invaders (1989, Rated PG)
    The Martians have invaded the USA (Prepare to die Earth Scum!) and a small town fights back. Don't ask questions, just sit back and enjoy the fun. Anyway, Big Bean, Illinois, has to exist somewhere.
 
 
3. The Adventures of Icabod and Mr. Toad (1950, Rated G)
     Walt Disney knew how to do cartoons. This is one of his best. The second half is on the "Legend of Sleepy Hollow" and the headless horseman, with Bing Crosby singing and doing the narration. I have been to the real Sleepy Hollow on the Hudson River in New York; and  the animators of this cartoon have it right.
 
 
4. The Ghost Breakers (1940, Rated G)
    This is the movie that gave Dan Akroyd the idea for "The Ghostbusters". Bob Hope, pre WW2 Cuba, a haunted castle, and a hidden treasure. What else do you need? (Watch for Bob Hope's classic remark about Democrats.)
 
 
5. The Thing from Another World (1951, Rated G)
     With actor James Arness as a giant "carrot" man from outer space, this movie is both funny and "campy". (By the way, the title of this movie, and the year it was released, have nothing to do with me; regardless of what any of my relatives have said.)
 
 
Honorable Mention: Signs (2002, Rated PG13)
     Mel Gibson is a preacher who has lost faith in God due to the death of his wife. However, events are starting to happen in the world that will shake his quiet existence in Pennsylvania. I will give you a prior warning: This movie is intense! The first time I saw it, my wife had gotten it for me to watch while she went to a school meeting. I knew nothing about the movie at all and watched it only because she had gone to all this trouble to do something nice for me. About a quarter of the way through (after turning on all the lights), I realized I was looking at a true classic.  
 
 
 
TRICK OR TREAT!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (44) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why I Fight

From 1942 through 1945, the US government commissioned seven films to demonstrate to American soldiers the reason for US involvement in World War II. These films were directed by Frank Capra and included the animation talents of the Disney studios and narration by Walter Houston. During the late 1950's, one of the local television stations in my area "aired" these films. They were shown during the early morning hours after this station came back "on air". By pure chance, I happened to catch the showing of the first film. During the next few weeks, I got up up early enough to watch the next six films.
 
I was fascinated by what I saw. Even though I realize now that these films contained a large amount of propaganda, they did show the feelings in our country concerning the reasons for involvement in this war.
 
On September 10, 2009, I also got up early, but not to watch a movie. I was present at the birth of my fourth grandchild. Although there were many problems after his birth, he now appears to be gaining weight and growing. But for awhile, my family and I were worried that he wouldn't make it.
 
I have included my favorite photographs of him in this article. They were made the day before he was released from NICU. When these photographs were made, he was out of danger and doing better. Why I like these photographs so much, I really don't know. But I believe that the reason I like them is what I can see in my grandson's eyes. What I see is, although he is very tired, he is a "fighter". He never gave up while he was in NICU. And that all he asks for now is a chance.
 
                                                  
 
I intend on giving him that chance.
 
(By the way, he does have my "nose"; but God was gracious. Everything else is from my daughter and son-in-law.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (84) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Forger of Thunderbolts

This morning, I read an excellent article concerning Thomas Alva Edison, written by my fellow electrical engineer "Redhead". In this article, Edison is described as an "@$$hole". "Redhead" is indeed correct. The real Edison is in no way is like the "Edison" portrayed by Spencer Tracy, in the 1940 movie, "Edison, The Man". Instead, he was a vindictive, aggressive, recluse. But he was a great "tinkerer". Although he "stole" many of the inventions he is famous for perfecting, he did have many ideas that deserve recognition. "Redhead’s" article can be found at the following address:

http://redhead.blogtownhall.com/2009/09/28/modern_corporate_warfare.thtml

One of the many things Edison did that are richly deserving of fame was the "help" he gave to Charles Proteus Steinmetz in becoming a "world known" electrical engineer. Perhaps Edison did this for personal gain. But the "world" benefited from this "greed".

Charles Proteus Steinmetz (April 9, 1865 – October 26, 1923) was born in Breslau, a province of Silesia. At an early age, he astonished his teachers with his understanding of physics and mathematics. He had been deformed since birth (dwarfism, hunchback, and hip dyplasia). And he had lost his mother at the age of one year. But he found "release" in the study of science. He entered the university at Breslau in 1883 and specialized in mathematics and the physical sciences.

 
                

He also read widely in economics and politics, and in 1884 he associated himself with the Socialist party in Breslau. As he pursued his scientific education, he also continued his political activities, a pattern he was to continue throughout his life. As ghost editor of the Breslau Socialist newspaper, People's Voice, Steinmetz attracted the attention of the police. In 1888, just as he had finished the work for his doctor's degree, he learned of plans for his arrest and fled to Switzerland. He never received his degree. He immigrated to the United States in 1889.

Despite his earlier efforts and interest in socialism, by 1922 Steinmetz concluded that socialism would never work in America because the country lacked a "powerful, centralized government of competent men, remaining continuously in office" and because "only a small percentage of Americans accept this viewpoint today."

At the International Electrical Congress in Chicago in 1893 Steinmetz made one of his greatest contributions to the electrical engineering community. In a lecture and presentation describing the mathematics of alternating current phenomena (which had not previously been explained by earlier engineers), Steinmetz used the term "phasor" for his simplified mathematical representation of an electricity waveform. This "property" has greatly simplified the analysis of AC circuits. Since the 1970's, phasor measurement units have been used to measure the "health" of wide area electrical networks such as the US Electrical Grid.
           
           Hysteresis Loss As Expressed By Steinmetz

One of Steinmetz's great research projects was concerned with the phenomena of lightning. He undertook a systematic study of it, resulting in experiments of man-made lightning in the laboratory. This work was published and Steinmetz was called the "forger of thunderbolts", being the first to create "artificial" lightning in his GE football field-sized laboratory and high towers, using 120,000 volt generators. He also erected a lightning tower to attract lightning and studied the patterns and effects of lightning hits on tree bark, resulting in several theories and ideas (like the effect of lightning on plant growth).

He fostered the development of alternating current (AC) that made possible the expansion of the electric power industry in the United States. He formulated many of the mathematical theories used by electrical engineers. He made the first important discoveries in the understanding of hysteresis and "sequence reaction studies" that enabled electrical engineers to design electric motors and study "events" on an electric system.

In August of 1973, my wife and I traveled to Schenectady, New York. As an employee of the General Electric Company, I was to be trained as an "application engineer". It was at Schenectady, that a "country" engineer (myself) gained the training and knowledge that my father and grandfather (both electrical engineers) lacked. It was in Schenectady that I became intimately acquainted with Charles Proteus Steinmetz. I trained under engineers who trained under Steinmetz. My master in engineering was acquired at Union College under professors who had also trained under Steinmetz.

It can be said, that my knowledge of the field of electrical engineering is a direct result of Thomas Alva Edison’s greed and the scientific discoveries of a "hunchback" German, Charles Proteus Steinmetz.

For those who would like some additional information on Steinmetz, I recommend going to the following sites:

http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/history/steinmetz.html

http://www.yonkershistory.org/stein.html

http://www.union.edu/N/DS/s.php?s=1512

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (47) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Israeli Air Force and the F-16I (Sufa)

According to my sources, the Israeli Air Force  (IAF) has finished the  "war-game" portion of their tactical plan to hit the Iranian nuclear sites and is now moving into the selection and logistics part of their plan. Again, according to my sources, the main aircraft that has been selected to carry out the attack will be the Israeli Air Force's F-16I. I thought it might be nice to take a look at this "warbird" and one of the possible weapons systems that will be used in the attack (if such attack becomes necessary).
 
The F-16I nicknamed "Sufa" (Storm) is manufactured by Lockheed Martin and equipped with a Pratt & Whitney jet engine, as well as advanced systems developed in Israel according to the IAF's specifications by the country's defense industries. One of the most important systems the F-16I can carry are Conformal Fuel Tanks (CFT). These tanks are manufactured by the Israeli defense industry  and increase the aircraft's amount of internal fuel by 50%. Their purpose is to significantly prolong the aircraft's flight range and ability to remain in the air, while NOT reducing the amount of weapons the plane can carry. The tanks are installed on the plane's back and conform to it's figure.
 
    
                                        F-16I Shown with Conformal Fuel Tanks
 
 
The F-16I can also carry the Popeye Lite (Have Lite) air-to-surface stand-off missile. (This missile can carry a tactical nuclear warhead.) The range of this missile is classified; but my sources indicate they have a range of at least 150 nautical miles. One source indicated that this range can be increased by a factor of two; but he refused to describe how. 
 
    
                                                      F-16I with Popeye Lite
 
The Israelis now have naval assests in the Persian Gulf and permission to "violate" Saudi air space. Unless something radical happens shortly, I would expect the attack to commence in no less than eight months.
 
For more information on the F-16I, I heartily recommend going to the following site:
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (77) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Eagle Has Landed

This story was sent to me by my uncle (Korea, 3 tours in Viet Nam flying F-100's, Silver Star) and is one of the best "Fighter Pilot" stories that I have read in a long time. My uncle got the story from his wife's brother-in-law, Mr. Dale Titler. Some of you might recognize his name. Mr. Titler wrote The Day the Red Baron Died and numerous other books concerning aircraft, pilots, and aviation. I have been lucky enough to converse with Mr. Titler several times. Whether the story is true or not, it has a good lesson. I hope you enjoy the story.

The lesson of this story:

If you're forced to fight, give no quarter. And it's good to have "back-up" from your mate.

"This came from a gent who runs a 2000 acre corn farm up around Barron , WI -- not far from Oshkosh .  He used to fly F-4Es and F-16s for the Guard and participated in the first Gulf War. Submitted for your enjoyment, and as a reminder that there are other great, magnificent flyers around besides us.

I went out to plant corn for a bit to finish a field before tomorrow morning and witnessed The Great Battle.  A golden eagle - big b*stard, about six foot wingspan - flew right in front of the tractor. It was being chased by three crows that were continually dive bombing it and pecking at it. The crows do this because the eagles rob their nests when they find them.

At any rate, the eagle banked hard right in one evasive maneuver, then landed in the field about 100 feet from the tractor. This eagle stood about 3 feet tall. The crows all landed too and took up positions around the eagle at 120 degrees apart, but kept their distance at about 20 feet from the big bird. The eagle would take a couple steps towards one of the crows and they'd hop backwards and forward to keep their distance. Then the reinforcement showed up.

I happened to spot the eagle's mate hurtling down out of the sky at what appeared to be approximately Mach 1.5. Just before impact the eagle on the ground took flight, (obviously a coordinated tactic; probably pre-briefed) and the three crows which were watching the grounded eagle, also took flight thinking they were going to get in some more pecking on the big bird.

The first crow being targeted by the diving eagle never stood a snowball's chance in hell. There was a mid-air explosion of black feathers and that crow was done. The diving eagle then banked hard left in what had to be a 9G climbing turn, using the energy it had accumulated in the dive, and hit crow #2 less than two seconds later. 

Another crow dead.

The grounded eagle, which was now airborne and had an altitude advantage on the remaining crow, which was streaking eastward in full burner, made a short dive then banked hard right when the escaping crow tried to evade the hit. It didn't work - crow #3 bit the dust at about 20 feet altitude.

This aerial battle was better than any air show I've been to, including the warbirds show at Oshkosh! The two eagles ripped the crows apart and ate them on the ground, and as I got closer and closer working my way across the field, I passed within 20 feet of one of them as it ate its catch. It stopped and looked at me as I went by and you could see in the look of that bird that it knew who's Boss Of The Sky. What a beautiful bird!

I love it. Not only did they kill their enemy, they ate them."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (40) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Update: The Israeli Navy Gets Ready

Today, July 14, 2009, two more Israeli Navy ships passed through the Suez Canal. Both ships were Sa'ar 5-Class corvettes (the Hanit and the Eilat), and are armed with cruise missiles and a fairly good anti-aircraft/missile defense system. Earlier in June, one of the Israeli Navy's Dolphin class submarines had also sailed to the Red Sea through the Suez Canal. Beyond the ability to threaten shipping, some foreign media reports say Dolphins can fire nuclear-tipped cruise missiles and serve as Israel's deterrent "second-strike" capability, allowing Israel to launch nuclear weapons from afar even if the country itself is targeted by a nuclear attack.
 
My own investigations indicate that these two corvettes can also launch nuclear-tipped cruise missiles (the "Popeye").
 
The Israeli Navy is putting on quite a show.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (52) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Update: Obama Rebukes Biden on Israel

The Obama Administration "rebuked" Vice President Joe Biden and his comments (spoken on Sunday, July 5, 2009) concerning Israel. Vice President Joe Biden said in an interview broadcast Sunday that the United States would not stand in the way of Israel in its dealings with Iran's nuclear ambitions. But US State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said that suggestions (coming from reporters) that Biden could be seen as giving the Jewish state a "green light" to attack Iran were completely wrong.

 

"I certainly would not want to give a green light to any kind of military action," Kelly said. But he added, "We're not going to dictate [Israel's] actions."

 

"We're also committed to Israel's security. And we share Israel's deep concerns about Iran's nuclear program," Mr. Kelly explained.  

 

"I wouldn't read into it any more than what you see, then, as I said, that we respect Israel's sovereignty," Kelly replied when asked if Biden's comments indicated the administration is reconsidering its policy toward Iran.

 

Kelly also refuted any idea that President Barack Obama's administration would drop its policy to engage diplomatically with Iran. Analysts say Iran's crackdown on demonstrators disputing the June 12 presidential election has made it harder for the Obama administration to pursue diplomatic engagement with Iran.
 
Well, this is great. Now the rest of the world, including the Middle East, believe one or all of the following:
 
1. Obama is "wishy-washy" and gutless.
 
2. Biden is a nutty as a fruitcake.
 
3. The US and the Obama Administration don't have a clue of what is going on.
 
Personally, I believe it is all three.
 
 
Tags: war   Israel   Iran  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (62) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saudi Arabia Secretly Agrees to Allow Israel to Use Saudi Airspace for an Attack On Iran!

London's Sunday Times reported that Saudi Arabia would allow Israel to use its airspace to attack Iran. According to the report, Mossad chief Meir Dagan (chief of the Mossad since 2002) told Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu that Syria and Saudi sources have hinted to this diplomatic move. The results of this annoucement on the "world stage" were also interesting.
 
"The Saudis have tacitly agreed to the Israeli air force flying through their airspace on a mission which is supposed to be in the common interests of both Israel and Saudi Arabia," an unnamed Middle Eastern diplomatic source stated.
 
"The Saudis are very concerned about an Iranian nuclear bomb, even more than the Israelis," a former Israeli intelligence head stated.
 
John Bolton, the former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., said (speaking to several Arab leaders), "It was logical that Saudi Arabia would privately agree. None of them would say anything about it publicly, but they would certainly acquiesce in an overflight if the Israelis didn’t trumpet it as a big success."
 
Bolton added (refering to Israel's attack on a Syrian nuclear site in 2007), "To this day, the Israelis haven’t admitted the specifics, but there’s one less nuclear facility in Syria." Bolton also said that the Arab countries would publicly condemn Israel at the U.N. but would breathe easier if the Iranian nuclear threat would be eliminated.
 
And even the White House is starting to sound "tough". Vice-President Joe Biden said (in an interview on ABC television), "The United States would not stand in the way if Israel chooses to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities. The US could not interfere with any sovereign decision that Israel might take to defend itself against an Iranian nuclear threat. ... Look, Israel can determine for itself — it’s a sovereign nation — what’s in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else. We cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do.”
 
Several media sources reported Friday, July 3, 2009, that an Israeli Dolphin Class submarine passed through the Suez Canal on its way to the Red Sea last month as part of a naval exercise. Israeli security officials told the Reuters news agency that the exercise was done as part of testing Israel’s strategy in light of the Iranian nuclear threat. Egypt denied the reports.
 
Wow! An Israeli Dolphin Class submarine in the Red Sea!
 
On May 4, 2009, I stated the following: "Unless something happens in Iran, I would expect the Middle East to "explode" in no more than a year."
 
I stand by this statement.

Please check out the following articles:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1209627002111&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6638568.ece

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6651910.ece

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132195

Tags: war   Israel   Iran  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (37) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Ruins of Windsor or "A Civilization Gone with the Wind"

I have been so busy the last four weeks that I have not had time to do much more than work. However, during my business travel this last week, I was in southeastern Mississippi (South of Vicksburg). I had a chance to visit one of my state's most famous historical sites. Southwest of Port Gibson, Mississippi, there is located an old house site that has been featured in movies ("Raintree County") and has graced the cover of many magazines. The home that was located at this site was called Windsor. It was completed in 1861.
 
    

Perhaps some of the history of this home is appropriate. The Windsor Home and its plantation at one time covered 2,600 acres. Smith Coffee Daniell (who was born in Mississippi in 1826) built this house as a home for his family. In 1849 he married his cousin Catherine Freeland (1830-1903) by whom he had three children.

The home was constructed between 1859 and 1861 and cost over $175,000.00 to build. (In 2009, this corresponds to about $4,000,000.00.) Basic construction of the house was performed by slave labor. David Shroder, a noted architect of the time, designed the house itself. The bricks used in the construction of the columns were made on the plantation. The columns were then covered with mortar and plaster. There were 29 of these columns supporting the projecting roofline.
 
             
 
The fluted columns had wrought iron Corinthian capitals and were joined by an ornamental balustrade (handrail). The wrought ironwork was manufactured in St. Louis and shipped down the Mississippi River to the Port of Bruinsburg, three miles west of Windsor. Sadly, Smith Coffee Daniell lived in his new home only a few weeks before dying at the age of 34. During the War Between the States, both Confederate used the home and Union troops. In February of 1890, the home burned, leaving only what you see in the above photographs.
 
A Union soldier made the only known sketch of Windsor (before the fire) in 1863. Below is a copy of that sketch.
 
       
 

Margaret Mitchell had it correct. Looking at the ruins left of what was probably the most beautiful home ever to grace the State of Mississippi, I can only think of her famous book. These remaining columns represent a world and life style now departed.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (74) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel Prepares for War with Iran

Air Force reservists (who operate the Arrow and Patriot missile defense systems) have recently begun spending one day a week on duty to sharpen their skills, amid fears that in a conflict with Iran, dozens of long-range missiles would be fired at Israel. The decision to call up the operators of the Arrow and Patriot systems was made last year by head of the IAF's Air Defense Division Brig.-Gen. Daniel Milo.
An unidentified Israeli Air Force (IAF) officer reported, "We are working hard to be ready for the Iranian threat. We are preparing for barrages, split warheads and other surprises and therefore we need to retain a high operational level by everyone, including reservists." The scenarios that are conducted include the firing of large barrages at Israel from different countries at once, and the need for the operator to decide which missile to intercept first and at what stage of its flight. "There are difficult dilemmas that the operators face when it comes to missile defense," the officer said.
 
Last month, the IAF held its 17th test of the Arrow 2 interceptor, shooting down a missile mimicking an Iranian Shihab ballistic missile. The high-powered American X-Band radar (deployed in the Negev Desert in late 2008 as a farewell gift from former President George W. Bush) participated in the recent Arrow test and tracked the incoming target. Military sources said that the American X-Band radar was capable of providing "several minutes" of warning from when a missile is launched from Iran and until it is supposed to land in Israel.  
 
Later this year, the IAF will hold an exercise with the US military to jointly test three different ballistic missile defense systems, including the Israeli-made Arrow and the American-made THAAD and Aegis.
 
The French newspaper L'Express reported Sunday, May 3, 2009, that IAF fighter jets recently conducted a drill above the Strait of Gibraltar in preparation for a possible attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. According to the newspaper, the exercise included a mid-air refueling drill.
 
This is getting serious. The report from the French newspaper is especially troubling. Unless something happens in Iran, I would expect the Middle East to "explode" in no more than a year.
 
 
   
Tags: war   Israel   Iran  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (89) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Global Warming" Democrats Are "Chicken"

The United Kingdom's Lord Christopher Monckton (former science advisor to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher) claimed House Democrats have refused to allow him to appear alongside former Vice President Al Gore at a high profile global warming hearing on Friday April 24, 2009 at 10am in Washington. Monckton said that the Democrats rescinded his scheduled joint appearance at the House Energy and Commerce hearing on Friday. Monckton was informed that he would not be allowed to testify alongside Gore when his plane landed from Thursday afternoon.
 
According to Monckton, Representative Joe Barton (R-Texas) on the Energy & Commerce Committee, had invited him to go "head to head" with Al Gore and testify at the hearing on Capitol Hill Friday. But Monckton says that when his airplane from London landed in the U.S. on Thursday, he was informed that the former Vice-President had “chickened out” and there would be no joint appearance. Gore testified on Friday to the Subcommitte on Energy and the Enviroment's 4th day of hearings on the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. The hearing were held in the Rayburn House Office Building.
 
“Waxman knows there has been no 'global warming' for at least a decade. Waxman knows there has been seven and a half years' global cooling. Waxman knows that, in the words of the United Kingom High Court judge who condemned Gore's mawkish movie as materially, seriously, serially inaccurate, 'the Armageddon scenario that he depicts is not based on any scientific view,'” Monckton explained, speaking about Representative Henry Waxman (D-California), chairman of the committe. Monckton has previously testified before this House Committee in March.
 
It is obvious that the Democrats believe that if you tell a lie long enough (and refuse to allow any dissent), the "lie" might be believed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (71) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345678Next »