About Me

Name: Gray Ghost
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The Marcellus Ridge Natural Gas Field

In 2002, the U.S. Geological Service (USGS) made a hugh discovery in a 54,000 square-mile swath (stretching from West Virginia to New York) in the Appalachian Mountains. Geologists call this area the "Marcellus Ridge". The drawing below indicates the area of this ridge:
    
  
 
 
These geologists have conservatively estimated that the Marcellus shale contains 168 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in place and optimistically suggests that the amounts could be as high as 516 trillion cubic feet. The U.S. currently produces roughly 30 trillion cubic feet of natural gas per year from our existing wells. Due to the age of most of the existing natural gas wells, this number (i.e., 30 trillion cubic feet) is dropping.
 
The technology exists to easily recover 50 trillion cubic feet of gas from the Marcellus Ridge, thus keeping the U.S. production up. If this recovery is realized, the Marcellus Ridge would be considered a "Super Giant" gas field (the geologists' words, not mine).
 
Why then, you might ask, has no one really heard about this news? Well there are two reasons. First, in most states, geologic surveys are released to the public almost instantly. In Texas, for example, a survey must be released in 60 days or less. In Oklahoma and Nevada there are similar laws. However, in Pennsylvania (where the majority of this field is located) the information doesn't have to be made public for a full five years.
 
Second, guess who is playing "fast and loose" with this knowledge? If you guessed Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and the Democrat Party, then go to the head of the class.

My "so called conspiracy theories" are starting to multiply. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In the "Tank" for Renewable Energy

In business, timing is everything. On May 25, 2007, Speaker Nancy Pelosi bought at least $100,000.00 in the initial offering of a renewable energy stock. The name of this stock was "CLNE", standing for the Clean Energy Fuels Corporation. Some of you might remember the original name of this company. The original name of this company was "Pickens Fuel", so named after the company’s primary investor, T. Boone Pickens.

The reason I said "at least $100,000.00" (in the first paragraph) is that it is entirely possible that Speaker Pelosi bought over $3,000,000.00 in stock in this company. The listing of companies and individuals that bought stock during the initial offering (uncovered by such groups as "dontgo Movement.com") shows a large number of dummy corporations and Democrat-controlled trust funds. It is more than possible that Speaker Pelosi, and several key Democrat Leaders, now control CLNE.

So what, you might ask. Let’s go further along in time. On February 27, 2008, the US House of Representatives passed the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008 (H.R. 5351). Speaker Pelosi used extreme pressure to make sure this bill passed the US House. Some representatives said that Speaker Pelosi did everything but "place a gun to their head" to make sure they voted correctly. 

But concerning the US Senate version (S. 3044), what occurred was interesting. The bill needed 60 votes under Senate rules to move forward but failed 58 to 41, with 8 Republicans joining 48 Democrats and 2 independents in support of it. Aides of Senator John McCain said he would have opposed the measure, but he was absent during the vote. (Note: Speaker Pelosi chastised Senator McCain for his absence.) 

If the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008 had passed, the value of Speaker Pelosi’s stock could have been worth over $30,000,000.00. But more importantly, the Democrat Party would have controlled the development of renewable resources in the US. They would do so by determining who got grants and loans under the "rules" of this bill. However, you have to give Speaker Pelosi credit. As soon as it was evident that the "US Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008" was dead in the water, Speaker Pelosi and the California State Legislature hit the road with a "new battle plan".

The "new battle plan" is California's Proposition 10. (Proposition 10 is also known as the "California Alternative Fuels Initiative".) Proposition 10 would spend $5 billion in California bond money ($10 billion by the time the interest is paid, according to the LA Times) to promote natural gas as an cleaner alternative for automobile and truck fuel in California. Interestingly enough, in an LA Times editorial, Anthony Rubenstein was highly critical of Proposition 10, calling the proposition a "raid on California's general fund to support ‘Pickens’ self-serving national gas agenda."

"The initiative deceptively reads like it's supporting all alternative-fuel vehicles and renewable energy," Rubenstein wrote. "But a closer read finds a laundry list of cash grabs. … Much of the measure's billions could benefit Pickens' company to the exclusion of almost all other clean-vehicle fuels and technology."

And guess who T. Boone Pickens newest best friend is, at least since May 25, 2007?

But don’t worry. The Democrats have a new scheme for controlling US energy. On May 22, 2008, Representative Maxine Waters said the following during the "grilling" of oil executives during a US House panel meeting:

"And guess what this liberal would be all about. This liberal will be about socializing … uh, um. …" (The congresswoman paused to collect her thoughts.) "Would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies. …"

And what party affiliation is Representative Waters? And what state does she represent? For those who don’t know, she is a Democrat representing the 35th District of California. Strange isn’t it? Waters and Pelosi are both Democrats and both represent California.

I use to laugh at conspiracy theories (the JFK assassination, Bigfoot, etc.), but no more. As The Monkees use to say: "Now I’m a believer."
Please go to the following sites:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=72225

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-rubenstein29-2008jul29,0,2980323.story

http://www.house.gov/pelosi/

http://www.house.gov/waters/

http://dontgomovement.com/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (74) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »