About Me

Name: Gray Ghost
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Smokey and the Bandit???????

When I was at Mississippi State University (1969 through 1973), money was always a problem. I had a full scholarship in electrical engineering; but my father (wisely I might add) never gave me any "spending" money. Ocassionally he might give me $5.00 or $10.00 when I was home; but I had to earn my gasoline money, my dating money, my car insurance money, and my "spare cash" money. I worked in the High-Voltage Lab on campus ($1.25 per hour, 12 hours maximum per week). I worked during two of my years on campus in the Student Union ($1.25 per hour, 8 hours maximum per week). During the summer, I worked 40 hours per week at $1.50 to $1.75 per hour, anywhere I could get a job.
 
However, my second football game on campus, I realized that there was an opportunity to make alot of money real easily. I noted that most of the campus would pay $1.00 a can for Coors beer (or $5.00 a six-pack). At this time, the closest place to buy Coors beer was Texarkana, Texas. Just as in the movie "Smokey and the Bandit", in 1969 Coors beer was illegal East of the Mississippi River. My vehicle was a 1958 International Harvester Scout, with only a front seat and a covered "truck-like" back end. Gasoline was about $.25 per gallon; and my Scout got about 20 miles to the gallon with its slant 4 cylinder engine. (I hope you can see where this is going.)
 
Starkville, MS to Texarkana, TX is a straight "shot" on US Hwy. 82, approximately 350 miles for a round trip of 700 miles. My investment opportunity would require about 40 gallons of gasoline ($10.00) and the cost of beer (240 six-packs was about all my Scout could hold, costing about $275.00 including tax).
 
The net profits I could make were over $900.00. (240 x $5.00) - ($10.00 + $275.00) = $915.00.
 
$900.00 was BIG MONEY to me in 1969. I left on the Friday afternoon before the third footbal game on campus. Saturday morning, I was back on campus and made over $900.00. I don't remember the actual sum, but it was over $900.00. And I did this two more times during the fall of 1969.
 
My old Scout (which I wish I still had) wouldn't get over 50 mph. It had no radio. And it leaked when it rained. But that was alright, it had holes in the floor for the water to run out. I was never stopped by the highway patrol or police during my "Smokey and the Bandit" runs; but I remember several law enforcement officers looking me over very closely from their patrol cars and laughing.
 
I have told this story to my daughter several times. I hope when my grandchildren are old enough, I can tell them. Perhaps they will realize that their grandfather wasn't always an old "fart".
 
Anyway, the video at the following address is what started this whole email. It is one of the best chases I have seen in a while. And the music in the background of this video is from 1977's great movie "Smokey and the Bandit". Enjoy!
 
 
 
PS: I realize my Scout was not a "muscle" car; but with its 4-wheel drive it could go through mud that no "muscle" car could navigate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (43) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Book Review: The Life of Holt Collier

The Mississippi Delta has been said to extend from the front door of the Peabody Hotel in Memphis, Tennessee, to Catfish Row in Vicksburg, Mississippi. That this is a true statement is proven in the book, Holt Collier, His Life, His Roosevelt Hunts, and the Origin of the Teddy Bear. Written by a fellow Mississippian (Minor Ferris Buchanan), the book takes a look at the life of one of Mississippi's most famous sons, Holt Collier.

Born in approximately 1846, Holt was a slave of the family of General Thomas Hinds. General Hinds is famous in history as the leader of Hind’s Dragoons of Mississippi. This mounted military force fought the British and their Native American allies during the War of 1812. Under the command of General Andrew Jackson at New Orleans, Hind’s Dragoons helped give America one of its most famous military victories.

The world in which Holt Collier lived was quite different than the Mississippi Delta of the year 2010. The delta was little more than one large swamp, with immense cane breaks. Today it is one of the richest farming areas in the world, with topsoil depths of over twenty feet. In the Mississippi Delta of the 1800’s, wild game (such as bear, cougars, and deer) was abundant. Today, only the vast numbers of whitetail deer speak of the not too distant past.

Holt Collier could neither read nor write; but his life was that of legends. He served as a scout and sharpshooter for the Confederate army. During the Battle of Shiloh, he was present at the death General Albert Sidney Johnston. After the Civil War, he was charged with the murder of a corrupt Union officer, an officer in charge of the "reconstruction" policies of a vengeful federal government. He went to Texas and became a cowboy, herding cattle along the Chisolm Trail.

In the late 1800’s he moved back to Greenville, Mississippi. There for the next twenty years he was the most "celebrated" hunter in Mississippi. He was so famous that Teddy Roosevelt hired him twice to organize bear hunts in the southern Delta. During the first hunt, President Roosevelt declined to shoot a bear that Holt Collier had "wrestled" into submission. The legend of the "Teddy Bear" was born.
 
In 1936, Holt Collier passed away and was laid to rest in Greenville. However, some time in 1935, my 15-year-old father met and spoke to this paragon of Mississippi values. Dad had come to Greenville from Hollandale, Mississippi (about 25 miles away), with my grandfather. He later told me that Collier was one of greatest men he ever met. (Dad also got to "handle" the rifle given to Holt by a grateful President Teddy Roosevelt.)
 

I highly recommend this book.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (47) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

So We Can Drill Again?

Our "Fearless Leader" has reversed a ban on oil drilling off most U.S. shores today. The new policy would allow oil and natural gas exploration in waters along the southern Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and part of Alaska. Speaking at Andrews air base, he said, "This is not a decision that I've made lightly." Our Fearless Leader then threw his useful idiots (the environmentalists and "Greenies") "under a bus"; and said he had studied the issue for more than a year and concluded it was the correct thing to do, given the nation's "voracious thirst for energy", the need to produce jobs, and the need to keep American businesses competitive.

"We're announcing the expansion of offshore oil and gas exploration but in ways that balance the need to harness domestic energy resources and the need to protect America's natural resources. This announcement is part of a broader strategy that will move us from an economy that runs on fossil fuels and foreign oil to one that relies more on homegrown fuels and clean energy. And the only way this transition will succeed is if it strengthens our economy in the short term and long term," concluded our "Fearless Leader.

 
He ended by saying, "To fail to recognize this reality would be a mistake."
 
Well thank you Mr. Fearless Leader.
The only real problem in all of this "statesmanship" (and I use that term loosely) is that Obama has made no secret of the fact that one factor in his decision was to secure Republican support for a sweeping climate change bill that has languished in Congress.
 
In other words, our Fearless Leader is again "shopping for votes in the US Congress.
 
By the way, Obama did NOT include some of the new sites that have been discovered in Alaska. I guess this was a "bone" tossed to his "useful idiots".
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (55) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iranian Nuclear Weapons Will Mean the Destruction of Israel (Or So Think the Iranians)

On February 18, 2010, the Iranian web site Asr-e Iran stated that Iran's possession of nuclear weapons would threaten Israel's existence and lead to the elimination of Israel. The web site explained that Israel's sole reason for existence is the illusion that it can provide absolute security for the Jewish people. The web site further states that once Iran possesses nuclear weapons and shifts the balance of power in the Middle East, this will be end of Israel.

The Iranian web site states that Israel knows that even if Iran obtains nuclear weapons, it will never use them except in self-defense (i.e., in the event of a non-conventional or nuclear attack on Iran). Rather, Iran's possession of such weapons will sow in Israel a sense of "insecurity". This sense alone will be enough to shatter the "glass house" of an Israeli state in the Middle East.

Asr-e Iran writes in this article the following statements:

"An Iran with nuclear weapons means an end to the dream of 'secure Israel' – and this means the exodus of most of the residents of this occupied land (who immigrated there for absolute security and for jobs). This exodus will include human, financial, and other capital, and therefore will be a death sentence for this regime."

I gather two things from this Iranian web site. First, the intention all along of the Iranian nuclear program was the construction of nuclear weapons and the destruction of Israel. The lie put forth by the Iranian government that the nuclear program was to develop nuclear power for electric generation was just that, a lie.

Second, Iran must have a death wish. Any nuclear strike on Israel will mean the complete Israeli destruction of Iran. And I do mean any nuclear strike, including a terrorist smuggled nuclear bomb into Tel Aviv. Israel knows that this web site is no more than adjunct of the Iranian government. The Iranian government approves anything placed on this web site. (Also, as a corollary, Jerusalem and the surrounding vicinity now become the safest place in Israel. Islamic fundamentalists would also attack Iran if Jerusalem were attacked with a nuclear weapon.)

Again, the plot thickens. (Also here is an address to this Iranian web site's article: http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3989.htm.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (155) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Rats Are Leaving the Sinking USS O'Vomit

Today Senator Evan Bayh (D) of Indiana announced he will not run for re-election. So far in the US Senate, Senators Chris Dodd (D) of Connecticut and Byron Dorgan (D) of North Dakota have announced they too will not run for re-election. Senator "Dingy Harry" Reid (D) of Nevada is so far behind in the polls that, unless a miracle occurs, he will not be re-elected. Counting former Senator Ted Kennedy (D) of Massachusetts (who was replaced by a Republican in a special election after his death), this makes five Democrat losses in the US Senate. And though some Republicans in the US Senate are also resigning, they appear to be in solidly Conservative states with no chances for a Democrat to take their seat.
 
In the US House, it gets even more interesting. In Mississippi, only Rep. Bennie Thompson (D) appears to be safe. Both Gene Taylor (D) and Travis Childers (D) appear to be in trouble, and might not win re-election. (In my opinion, Rep. Travis Childers is "toast". The only way he can keep his seat is to resign from the Democrat Party.) In Tennessee, two Democrat representaives have announced that they are not running for re-election (Gordon and Tanner). In Connecticut, Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D) has announced that he will not run for re-election. Rep. Dennis Moore (D) of Kansas and Rep. Brian Baird (D) of Washington have also announced they will not run for re-election. In Alabama Rep. Parker Griffith resigned from the Democrat Party and is now a Republican. There have also been some resignation announcements from Republicans. But as in the US Senate, they appear to be in solidly Conservative states in all but one case. It now appears that the Democrats will lose the US House in 2010.
 
Today is February 15, 2010. We are eight months away from the midterm elections. If this trend of Democrat resignations continues, these elections will be a "bloodbath" for the Democrats.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (98) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Iran "Backing Off" from the Threat to Destroy Israel?

Back on October 31, 2009, the Saudi daily Al-Watan published an article about an unprecedented crisis in Yemen-Iran relations. The Yemen government accused Iran of supporting the Houthi rebels in the Sa'da region of northern Yemen. The article indicated that apprehension was increasing in Saudi Arabia about the ramifications of Iran's increased military activity in Yemen and in the Red Sea.
 
Today, January 4, 2010, the Saudi newspaper Al-Riyadh quoted a high-ranking Yemeni diplomatic source in Cairo which claimed that the U.S. is refraining from dealing harshly with the Houthi rebels, in order not to anger Iran. Yemeni Foreign Minister Abu Bakr Al-Kirbi denied that the U.S. had attacked Al-Qaeda strongholds in Yemen, saying, "Yemen army aircraft had carried out the bombings."
 
Al-Kirbi further said said that Yemen and the U.S. had not reached an agreement over the use of U.S. aircraft or cruise missiles for bombing Al-Qaeda targets on Yemeni soil.
 
"Skirmishes" between Iraqi and Iranian military forces on the border between these two countries are increasing in number.
 
The Qom Seminary Teachers Society, which supports Ahmadinejad, recently announced that Ayatollah Yousef Sanei (a supporter of the Iranian protest movement and critic of the Iranian president) had been stripped of his religious title.
 
In a recent sermon in Tehran, Guardian Council Secretary Ahmad Jannati said, "The regime could not tolerate opposition and insults to Islam, and that the members of the protest movement must apologize to the people for their actions or else be executed."
 
Meanwhile, Iranian protest movement leader Mir Hossein Mousavi has posted on his FaceBook page a five-point plan for resolving the crisis in Iran after the latest protests:
        
      1. The regime will acknowledge its responsibility for the crisis.
      2. New clean elections will be held.
      3. Prisoners and protesters will be freed.
      4. Freedom of the press, of expression and of assembly will be guaranteed.
      5. Freedom of action will be given to political parties.
 
Mousavi declared that he and Mehdi Karroubi (Iranian reformist politician and one of the major leaders of the Iranian protest movement) are willing to die for their cause.
 
If all of the above sounds confusing, join the club. Iran seems to be on conflicting paths. And the direction these paths could take could lead to anything from an interal revolution to a war with Iran's neighbors.
 
On the other hand, Israel is being very quiet. Almost too quiet. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (41) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming in the Mississippi Delta

Global Warming hit the Mississippi Delta with a vengeance this morning. And the following photos attest to the degree of "warming".
        
                  
 
At 6:00am this morning, the wind chill was 12 degrees F, with an actual temperature of 22 degrees F. The winds were from the Northwest at about 8 mph, and the humidity was 72%.
 
Frankly I am getting tired of Al Gore and his "con" game.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (32) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. History and Why We Study It

When I was a boy, about 6 or 7 years old, my father did a wonderful thing. He "turned me on" to the study of history. At first I studied World War 2. My father had served in this war as a fighter pilot. I met many of his old friends who were also fighter pilots. Naturally, as a young boy, their stories and their camaraderie mystified me. It all seemed to be "dream-like", something that happened long ago.

As I got older, I branched out in my studies. My family and I visited Shiloh when I was about 9. I was amazed at this national park. The numbers of dead soldiers, both North and South, were almost inconceivable. And because the Civil War Centennial was just starting up (with men dressing in the colorful uniforms of that period), I decided to start my study of the Civil War in conjunction with my study of World War 2.

At age 13, I added World War 1 after seeing "Sergeant York" at junior high school. At age 15 I saw "Northwest Passage" on TV; this caused me to include the French and Indian War. During the summer between my junior and senior years in high school, I saw "Drums Along the Mohawk" on TV. Naturally I added the Revolutionary War.

By the time I was at Mississippi State University (and in Air Force ROTC), all my spare time was spent either dating my future wife (who was at MSCW), hunting at Noxubee Refuge, fishing at Oktibbeha Lake, or reading books on history. In 1973, the US Air Force enacted a RIF (Reduction in Force). I decided to get out and pursue the profession I had been training for at MSU (i.e., electrical engineering).

For the next 35 years, I read and studied history as a hobby. I have learned much in my studies. I learned, for example, that we are blessed in this country with literally thousands of men and women worthy of emulation.

I learned that history is fixed. In and of itself, it cannot be changed. Our interpretation of it might change, but the actual events themselves cannot change. Sometimes, newly discovered, first-hand accounts of historical events can cause our knowledge of these events to increase. But all in all, HISTORY DOES NOT CHANGE. That means that we in the US share a common bond, i.e. our history. That common bond brings us together as a people. It means a citizen from California and a citizen from Mississippi can always find a "kinship" to each other. Their accents might differ. Their taste in food and music might differ. But we are all part of this great experience started in 1776.

I also learned that the study of history can give some one a unique insight into the future. In so much as the following quote is from a man who although I do not like or respect his lifestyle, I totally believe was correct in this statement of fact:

"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."

  George Santayana

Truer words were never spoken. But they are true only in one sense. If you do the same things, over and over, not only will you repeat history but also you are an idiot. If, on the other hand, you learned from your first experience and tried something new, then at least you have a chance of changing the consequences of your actions.

Also the study of US History can be a powerful training tool for the youth of this country. As I mentioned, there are literally thousands of men and women in our history who are worthy of emulation. They were from all walks of life and all races. These include such diverse people as: Charles Proteus Steinmetz (engineering), George W. Carver (botany), John F. Reynolds (US military), Jonas E. Salk (medicine), and Booker T. Washington (education). Today’s young person can do a lot worse than pattern their lives after the people I just mentioned.

Examples are important. Without them our children are lacking a "reference" point.

US History is fixed. Unless new evidence is found, it cannot be changed. My wife is a public school teacher. She has taught for 28 years. In the last few years I have noticed subtle changes occurring in the high school level history textbooks. For example, these books now state that slavery was the only cause of the Civil War. That is like saying that grape jelly is the only "condiment" that can be used to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. There are no discussions that it was the primary cause along with the rise of "regionalism" and the political factor of "states’ rights". There are no discussions of economic causes. There are no discussions of the political chaos brought about by a battle between the differing factions in the US Congress. No, the only cause of the Civil War is now said to be slavery.

Is this being written to: to increase the tension between whites and blacks in this country, to alleviate the guilt felt by the writers of these textbooks, or perhaps to change the regional perceptions felt by all parts of our nation? Whatever the reason for this change in recent textbooks (and other changes I did not mention), they do have one great effect: they will dissolve the bonds that join us together. A black New Yorker will now tend to be more than ever distrustful of a white Tennessean. A Hispanic from Los Angeles will now tend to be more than ever distrustful of an Asian from Baltimore.

By "changing" history, "distrust" is being entered into the US equation.

The knowledge of history can translate into knowledge of the future. If we know that "x" plus "y" does NOT equal "z" (from past experience), then we know in the future not to try that again. However, if the history textbooks have been changed, then perhaps we will not know to try that again.

US History is filled with failures that do not need to be repeated: the sexual revolution of the 1960’s, recreational drug use (both in the late 1800’s and the late 1900’s), and others.
 
So perhaps the answer to my question ("U.S. History and Why Do We Study It") is twofold. First, it is part of the "bond" that we as citizens of the US share, part of the "glue" that keeps us together. Second, the knowledge of this history will perhaps keep us from making the same mistakes over and over again.
Tags: US History  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (52) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Top Ten Favorite War Movies

Sometimes, we all need some fun. So after reading the 11/17/09 edition of The Weekly Claw at Crawfish's site, I decided to post my own "Top Ten" list of my favorite war movies.
  1. Battleground: Release Date: November 9, 1949; B/W; Winner of two Academy Awards (nominated for 6, including Best Picture).
  2. Van Johnson, Ricardo Montalban and George Murphy star in this remarkable war film. The movie deals with the 327th Glider Regiment of the 101st Division at the Battle at Bastogne.

     

  3. They Were Expendable: Release Date: December 20, 1945; B/W; Nominated for two Academy Rewards.
  4. Robert Montgomery, John Wayne and Ward Bond star in this war film, directed by John Ford. It is a dramatized account of the role of the American PT Boats in the defense of the Philippines in early World War II. The screenplay was taken from the book of same name.

  5. Twelve O’Clock High: Release Date: February 13, 1950; B/W; Winner of two Academy Awards (nominated for 4, including Best Picture).
  6. Gregory Peck and Dean Jagger star in this movie about the 8th Air Force during World War II. In this story of the early days of daylight bombing raids over Germany, an American General must take command of a "hard luck" bomber group. Much of the story deals with his struggle to whip his group into a disciplined fighting unit in spite of heavy losses, and withering attacks by German fighters over their targets. Actual combat footage is used in this war drama.

     

  7. Sergeant York: Release Date: September 27, 1941; B/W; Winner of two Academy Awards (nominated for 11, including Best Picture).
  8. Gary Cooper stars in this true story about one of America’s greatest heroes and Medal of Honor winner, Alvin York of Tennessee. Alvin York was an advisor during filming.

     

  9. The Story of GI Joe: Release Date: July 13, 1945; B/W; Nominated for four Academy Awards.
  10. Burgess Meredith and Robert Mitchum star in this movie about the US Army in North Africa, Sicily, and Italy. The film is directed from the viewpoint of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. And the movie shows how the individual G.I. survived the drudgery of war, the discomfort of war, and the terror of combat.

     

  11. Gettysburg: Release Date: October 8, 1993; Color.
  12. Jeff Daniels steals the show while portraying Medal of Honor winner Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain of Maine. The screenplay is taken from the Pulitzer Prize winning book, The Killer Angels.

     

  13. Guadalcanal Diary: Release Date: October 27, 1943; B/W.
  14. Anthony Quinn and Lloyd Nolan star in this movie about the Marines at Guadalcanal . The screenplay is taken from the book of the same name, written by war correspondent Lamar Trotti.

     


  15. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo: Release Date: November 1, 1944; B/W; Winner of one Academy Award (nominated for 2).
  16. Van Johnson and Spencer Tracy star in this true story about the first bombing of Japan during World War II. The screenplay is taken from the book of the same name, written by a participant in the raid (Ted Lawson). (Note: My mother dated Ted Lawson’s copilot during the raid, Dean Davenport, for awhile during the war.)

  17. To Hell and Back: Release Date: October 18, 1955; Color.
  18. Audie Murphy of Texas stars as himself, the most decorated soldier in US history and winner of the Medal of Honor. The screenplay was taken from his autobiography.

  19. The Sands of Iwo Jima: Release Date: March 1, 1950; B/W; Nominated for four Academy Awards, including Best Actor for John Wayne.
          John Wayne stars in this movie about the Marines at Tarawa and Iwo Jima.

Be sure to take a look at the 11/20/09 edition of The Weekly Claw. Crawfish will publish his own list of war movies.
 

Tags: war movies  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (36) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Five Favorite Halloween Movies

Since we are close to Halloween, I thought I would again post my personal list of the 5 best Halloween movies of all time (also with an honorable mention). I hope you will enjoy this list; I will personally guarantee that all of these movies are worth watching. However, you are advised that "Signs" is very intense so it might not be a good movie for children under the age of ten(10). 

If you have your own list of movies, please send it to me. I am always on the lookout for good movies.
 
 
1. Arsenic and Old Lace (1944, Rated G)
    It doesn't get any better than this Cary Grant movie. The scene is Brooklyn. It is Halloween night. The Brewsters have a few family secrets and more than their share of relatives that are not playing with a full deck. If you have never seen this true classic, you need to.
 
 
2. Spaced Invaders (1989, Rated PG)
    The Martians have invaded the USA (Prepare to die Earth Scum!) and a small town fights back. Don't ask questions, just sit back and enjoy the fun. Anyway, Big Bean, Illinois, has to exist somewhere.
 
 
3. The Adventures of Icabod and Mr. Toad (1950, Rated G)
     Walt Disney knew how to do cartoons. This is one of his best. The second half is on the "Legend of Sleepy Hollow" and the headless horseman, with Bing Crosby singing and doing the narration. I have been to the real Sleepy Hollow on the Hudson River in New York; and  the animators of this cartoon have it right.
 
 
4. The Ghost Breakers (1940, Rated G)
    This is the movie that gave Dan Akroyd the idea for "The Ghostbusters". Bob Hope, pre WW2 Cuba, a haunted castle, and a hidden treasure. What else do you need? (Watch for Bob Hope's classic remark about Democrats.)
 
 
5. The Thing from Another World (1951, Rated G)
     With actor James Arness as a giant "carrot" man from outer space, this movie is both funny and "campy". (By the way, the title of this movie, and the year it was released, have nothing to do with me; regardless of what any of my relatives have said.)
 
 
Honorable Mention: Signs (2002, Rated PG13)
     Mel Gibson is a preacher who has lost faith in God due to the death of his wife. However, events are starting to happen in the world that will shake his quiet existence in Pennsylvania. I will give you a prior warning: This movie is intense! The first time I saw it, my wife had gotten it for me to watch while she went to a school meeting. I knew nothing about the movie at all and watched it only because she had gone to all this trouble to do something nice for me. About a quarter of the way through (after turning on all the lights), I realized I was looking at a true classic.  
 
 
 
TRICK OR TREAT!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (44) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why I Fight

From 1942 through 1945, the US government commissioned seven films to demonstrate to American soldiers the reason for US involvement in World War II. These films were directed by Frank Capra and included the animation talents of the Disney studios and narration by Walter Houston. During the late 1950's, one of the local television stations in my area "aired" these films. They were shown during the early morning hours after this station came back "on air". By pure chance, I happened to catch the showing of the first film. During the next few weeks, I got up up early enough to watch the next six films.
 
I was fascinated by what I saw. Even though I realize now that these films contained a large amount of propaganda, they did show the feelings in our country concerning the reasons for involvement in this war.
 
On September 10, 2009, I also got up early, but not to watch a movie. I was present at the birth of my fourth grandchild. Although there were many problems after his birth, he now appears to be gaining weight and growing. But for awhile, my family and I were worried that he wouldn't make it.
 
I have included my favorite photographs of him in this article. They were made the day before he was released from NICU. When these photographs were made, he was out of danger and doing better. Why I like these photographs so much, I really don't know. But I believe that the reason I like them is what I can see in my grandson's eyes. What I see is, although he is very tired, he is a "fighter". He never gave up while he was in NICU. And that all he asks for now is a chance.
 
                                                  
 
I intend on giving him that chance.
 
(By the way, he does have my "nose"; but God was gracious. Everything else is from my daughter and son-in-law.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (84) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Forger of Thunderbolts

This morning, I read an excellent article concerning Thomas Alva Edison, written by my fellow electrical engineer "Redhead". In this article, Edison is described as an "@$$hole". "Redhead" is indeed correct. The real Edison is in no way is like the "Edison" portrayed by Spencer Tracy, in the 1940 movie, "Edison, The Man". Instead, he was a vindictive, aggressive, recluse. But he was a great "tinkerer". Although he "stole" many of the inventions he is famous for perfecting, he did have many ideas that deserve recognition. "Redhead’s" article can be found at the following address:

http://redhead.blogtownhall.com/2009/09/28/modern_corporate_warfare.thtml

One of the many things Edison did that are richly deserving of fame was the "help" he gave to Charles Proteus Steinmetz in becoming a "world known" electrical engineer. Perhaps Edison did this for personal gain. But the "world" benefited from this "greed".

Charles Proteus Steinmetz (April 9, 1865 – October 26, 1923) was born in Breslau, a province of Silesia. At an early age, he astonished his teachers with his understanding of physics and mathematics. He had been deformed since birth (dwarfism, hunchback, and hip dyplasia). And he had lost his mother at the age of one year. But he found "release" in the study of science. He entered the university at Breslau in 1883 and specialized in mathematics and the physical sciences.

 
                

He also read widely in economics and politics, and in 1884 he associated himself with the Socialist party in Breslau. As he pursued his scientific education, he also continued his political activities, a pattern he was to continue throughout his life. As ghost editor of the Breslau Socialist newspaper, People's Voice, Steinmetz attracted the attention of the police. In 1888, just as he had finished the work for his doctor's degree, he learned of plans for his arrest and fled to Switzerland. He never received his degree. He immigrated to the United States in 1889.

Despite his earlier efforts and interest in socialism, by 1922 Steinmetz concluded that socialism would never work in America because the country lacked a "powerful, centralized government of competent men, remaining continuously in office" and because "only a small percentage of Americans accept this viewpoint today."

At the International Electrical Congress in Chicago in 1893 Steinmetz made one of his greatest contributions to the electrical engineering community. In a lecture and presentation describing the mathematics of alternating current phenomena (which had not previously been explained by earlier engineers), Steinmetz used the term "phasor" for his simplified mathematical representation of an electricity waveform. This "property" has greatly simplified the analysis of AC circuits. Since the 1970's, phasor measurement units have been used to measure the "health" of wide area electrical networks such as the US Electrical Grid.
           
           Hysteresis Loss As Expressed By Steinmetz

One of Steinmetz's great research projects was concerned with the phenomena of lightning. He undertook a systematic study of it, resulting in experiments of man-made lightning in the laboratory. This work was published and Steinmetz was called the "forger of thunderbolts", being the first to create "artificial" lightning in his GE football field-sized laboratory and high towers, using 120,000 volt generators. He also erected a lightning tower to attract lightning and studied the patterns and effects of lightning hits on tree bark, resulting in several theories and ideas (like the effect of lightning on plant growth).

He fostered the development of alternating current (AC) that made possible the expansion of the electric power industry in the United States. He formulated many of the mathematical theories used by electrical engineers. He made the first important discoveries in the understanding of hysteresis and "sequence reaction studies" that enabled electrical engineers to design electric motors and study "events" on an electric system.

In August of 1973, my wife and I traveled to Schenectady, New York. As an employee of the General Electric Company, I was to be trained as an "application engineer". It was at Schenectady, that a "country" engineer (myself) gained the training and knowledge that my father and grandfather (both electrical engineers) lacked. It was in Schenectady that I became intimately acquainted with Charles Proteus Steinmetz. I trained under engineers who trained under Steinmetz. My master in engineering was acquired at Union College under professors who had also trained under Steinmetz.

It can be said, that my knowledge of the field of electrical engineering is a direct result of Thomas Alva Edison’s greed and the scientific discoveries of a "hunchback" German, Charles Proteus Steinmetz.

For those who would like some additional information on Steinmetz, I recommend going to the following sites:

http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/history/steinmetz.html

http://www.yonkershistory.org/stein.html

http://www.union.edu/N/DS/s.php?s=1512

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (47) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Israeli Air Force and the F-16I (Sufa)

According to my sources, the Israeli Air Force  (IAF) has finished the  "war-game" portion of their tactical plan to hit the Iranian nuclear sites and is now moving into the selection and logistics part of their plan. Again, according to my sources, the main aircraft that has been selected to carry out the attack will be the Israeli Air Force's F-16I. I thought it might be nice to take a look at this "warbird" and one of the possible weapons systems that will be used in the attack (if such attack becomes necessary).
 
The F-16I nicknamed "Sufa" (Storm) is manufactured by Lockheed Martin and equipped with a Pratt & Whitney jet engine, as well as advanced systems developed in Israel according to the IAF's specifications by the country's defense industries. One of the most important systems the F-16I can carry are Conformal Fuel Tanks (CFT). These tanks are manufactured by the Israeli defense industry  and increase the aircraft's amount of internal fuel by 50%. Their purpose is to significantly prolong the aircraft's flight range and ability to remain in the air, while NOT reducing the amount of weapons the plane can carry. The tanks are installed on the plane's back and conform to it's figure.
 
    
                                        F-16I Shown with Conformal Fuel Tanks
 
 
The F-16I can also carry the Popeye Lite (Have Lite) air-to-surface stand-off missile. (This missile can carry a tactical nuclear warhead.) The range of this missile is classified; but my sources indicate they have a range of at least 150 nautical miles. One source indicated that this range can be increased by a factor of two; but he refused to describe how. 
 
    
                                                      F-16I with Popeye Lite
 
The Israelis now have naval assests in the Persian Gulf and permission to "violate" Saudi air space. Unless something radical happens shortly, I would expect the attack to commence in no less than eight months.
 
For more information on the F-16I, I heartily recommend going to the following site:
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (77) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Eagle Has Landed

This story was sent to me by my uncle (Korea, 3 tours in Viet Nam flying F-100's, Silver Star) and is one of the best "Fighter Pilot" stories that I have read in a long time. My uncle got the story from his wife's brother-in-law, Mr. Dale Titler. Some of you might recognize his name. Mr. Titler wrote The Day the Red Baron Died and numerous other books concerning aircraft, pilots, and aviation. I have been lucky enough to converse with Mr. Titler several times. Whether the story is true or not, it has a good lesson. I hope you enjoy the story.

The lesson of this story:

If you're forced to fight, give no quarter. And it's good to have "back-up" from your mate.

"This came from a gent who runs a 2000 acre corn farm up around Barron , WI -- not far from Oshkosh .  He used to fly F-4Es and F-16s for the Guard and participated in the first Gulf War. Submitted for your enjoyment, and as a reminder that there are other great, magnificent flyers around besides us.

I went out to plant corn for a bit to finish a field before tomorrow morning and witnessed The Great Battle.  A golden eagle - big b*stard, about six foot wingspan - flew right in front of the tractor. It was being chased by three crows that were continually dive bombing it and pecking at it. The crows do this because the eagles rob their nests when they find them.

At any rate, the eagle banked hard right in one evasive maneuver, then landed in the field about 100 feet from the tractor. This eagle stood about 3 feet tall. The crows all landed too and took up positions around the eagle at 120 degrees apart, but kept their distance at about 20 feet from the big bird. The eagle would take a couple steps towards one of the crows and they'd hop backwards and forward to keep their distance. Then the reinforcement showed up.

I happened to spot the eagle's mate hurtling down out of the sky at what appeared to be approximately Mach 1.5. Just before impact the eagle on the ground took flight, (obviously a coordinated tactic; probably pre-briefed) and the three crows which were watching the grounded eagle, also took flight thinking they were going to get in some more pecking on the big bird.

The first crow being targeted by the diving eagle never stood a snowball's chance in hell. There was a mid-air explosion of black feathers and that crow was done. The diving eagle then banked hard left in what had to be a 9G climbing turn, using the energy it had accumulated in the dive, and hit crow #2 less than two seconds later. 

Another crow dead.

The grounded eagle, which was now airborne and had an altitude advantage on the remaining crow, which was streaking eastward in full burner, made a short dive then banked hard right when the escaping crow tried to evade the hit. It didn't work - crow #3 bit the dust at about 20 feet altitude.

This aerial battle was better than any air show I've been to, including the warbirds show at Oshkosh! The two eagles ripped the crows apart and ate them on the ground, and as I got closer and closer working my way across the field, I passed within 20 feet of one of them as it ate its catch. It stopped and looked at me as I went by and you could see in the look of that bird that it knew who's Boss Of The Sky. What a beautiful bird!

I love it. Not only did they kill their enemy, they ate them."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (40) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Update: The Israeli Navy Gets Ready

Today, July 14, 2009, two more Israeli Navy ships passed through the Suez Canal. Both ships were Sa'ar 5-Class corvettes (the Hanit and the Eilat), and are armed with cruise missiles and a fairly good anti-aircraft/missile defense system. Earlier in June, one of the Israeli Navy's Dolphin class submarines had also sailed to the Red Sea through the Suez Canal. Beyond the ability to threaten shipping, some foreign media reports say Dolphins can fire nuclear-tipped cruise missiles and serve as Israel's deterrent "second-strike" capability, allowing Israel to launch nuclear weapons from afar even if the country itself is targeted by a nuclear attack.
 
My own investigations indicate that these two corvettes can also launch nuclear-tipped cruise missiles (the "Popeye").
 
The Israeli Navy is putting on quite a show.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (52) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345678Next »